is heard often in this period, a claim: the more you are unsure of its identity, the easier it is to meet the ' more. Part of the Northern League
background to justify the filing of false identity elements (the Po Valley for example), but recovery is worryingly, for example, in an interview yesterday in Chiamparino Fazio.
What's wrong with this statement?
spoken primarily of identity as something static, as if you could do a photo identity. In reality we who have our identity, is constantly changing. Interaction with others, the choice of language for expressing, in readings, in the work that has happened to us or wanted to do.
Our identity changes with age, with the marriage, with children.
From these considerations it appears a second characteristic important: our identity is plural. Each of us is more identified with his kind, his work, his passions or his age? My husband is an engineer or a mountaineer? I'm more mom, professional or fifty?
Continued riprosizione an identity static and simple is a conceptual error of vast scope, because it builds walls between us and them, stiffen marginal membership. Indeed, as in the League, proposed non-existent issues, such as the Po Valley. When it becomes a leitmotif leads to war (see Marco Aime, culture or excesses of the great Amartya Sen, Identity and Violence)
Sure you is hard to digest that we we change all the time, that we spoke the language (dialect), will be replaced in a few years from English, such as it was Italian. But
back is simply impossible to leave their historic task and we let's enjoy our identity and changing pluriancorata.
0 comments:
Post a Comment